Using simple statistics, the probability of a core melting accident within 1 year of reactor operation is 4 in 14, 816 reactor years, or 1 in 3704 reactor years. There have been only two major accidents at nuclear power plants, and their impacts have been much less serious than previously feared. Nuclear energy is the safest source of energy that we use anywhere in the world. In view of their findings, researchers call for an in-depth analysis and reassessment of the risks associated with nuclear power plants.
The impact of nuclear accidents has been a topic of debate since the first nuclear reactors were built in 1954 and has been a key factor in public concern for nuclear facilities. Despite the efforts of the operators of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant to maintain control, the reactor cores in units 1-3 overheated, the nuclear fuel melted, and the three containment vessels broke. In 1970, there were doubts about the ability of the emergency cooling system of a nuclear reactor core to cope with the effects of an accident involving loss of coolant and the consequent melting of the fuel core; the topic became popular in technical and popular presses. If the building were to fail and dust were released to the environment, the release of a given mass of fission products that have aged for almost thirty years would have a smaller effect than the release of the same mass of fission products (in the same chemical and physical form) that had only undergone a short cooling time (for example, one hour) after the nuclear reaction had ended.
Soon after the Chernobyl accident, it became clear that the main impacts of nuclear accidents are not radiological, but socio-economic and psychological, driven by misconceptions about the health effects of radiation. However, a more detailed analysis of the probabilities of nuclear accidents requires more transparency on the part of the IAEA. In conclusion, the number of core melting accidents that can be expected over time in nuclear power plants is higher than previously expected. In a modern reactor, a nuclear fusion, whether partial or total, must be contained within the reactor containment structure.
The improved safety and unique benefits of the MKER design improve its competitiveness in countries considering full fuel cycle options for nuclear development. In 1954, the Soviet Union connected the first nuclear reactor to the grid; Calder Hall, in England, followed it 2 years later. However, the Agency does not publish a historical database of these accidents, probably because it has the dual function of regulating and promoting the nuclear industry. The VHTR is expected to be prototyped and tested at the Idaho National Laboratory within the next decade (starting in 200), based on the design selected for the Next Generation Nuclear Power Plant by the United States Department of Energy.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) defines a nuclear and radiation accident as an event that has had significant consequences for people, the environment or the facility. For starters, they say that the new database reveals how poor the International Nuclear Event Scale really is. The investigators also determined that, in the event of such a serious accident, half of the radioactive cesium-137 would spread in an area more than 1000 kilometers from the nuclear reactor.